Latest & greatest articles for warfarin

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on warfarin or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on warfarin and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for warfarin

21. Effect of BMI on efficacy and safety of DOACs compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

Effect of BMI on efficacy and safety of DOACs compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files

2019 PROSPERO

22. Direct oral anticoagulation versus warfarin for postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Direct oral anticoagulation versus warfarin for postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Print | PDF PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. The registrant confirms that the information supplied for this submission is accurate and complete. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content

2019 PROSPERO

23. Genotype-Guided Warfarin Dosing in Patients With Mechanical Valves: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Genotype-Guided Warfarin Dosing in Patients With Mechanical Valves: A Randomized Controlled Trial The clinical utility of genotype-guided warfarin dosing remains controversial. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of genotype-guided warfarin dosing in East Asians.A double-blind, randomized control trial was performed to compare a genotype-guided dosing algorithm (CYP2C9, VKORC1, and CYP4F2) with a clinical-guided one in the initiation treatment for patients (...) days, p = 0.009). The TTRs were 47.257% and 47.461% in the control and study group (p = 0.941), respectively. Patients with the CYP2C9 *1/*3 genotype had higher international normalized ratio (INR) variability than patients with the CYP2C9 *1/*1 genotype (p = 0.024). Compared with normal and sensitive responders, the highly sensitive responders were at increased risk of an INR of 4.0 or greater (p < 0.05).The genotype-guided warfarin dosing was safe and might be more efficient for the time to reach

2018 EvidenceUpdates

24. Periprocedural Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis of Phase III Trials

Periprocedural Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis of Phase III Trials Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are surpassing warfarin as the anticoagulant of choice for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. DOAC outcomes in elective periprocedural settings have not been well elucidated and remain a source of concern for clinicians. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the periprocedural safety and efficacy (...) of DOACs versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.We reviewed the literature for data from phase III randomized controlled trials comparing DOACs with warfarin in the periprocedural period among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Substudies from 4 trials (RE-LY [Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy], ROCKET AF [Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial

2018 EvidenceUpdates

25. Association of Genetic Variants With Warfarin-Associated Bleeding Among Patients of African Descent. (PubMed)

Association of Genetic Variants With Warfarin-Associated Bleeding Among Patients of African Descent. Major warfarin-related bleeding occurs more frequently in African Americans than in other populations. Identification of potential genetic factors related to this adverse event may help identify at-risk patients.To identify genetic factors associated with warfarin-related bleeding in patients of African descent at an international normalized ratio (INR) of less than 4.A case-control genome-wide (...) association study involving patients of African descent taking warfarin was conducted in a discovery cohort (University of Chicago [2009-2011] and the University of Illinois at Chicago [2002-2011]), and associations were confirmed in a replication cohort (University of Chicago [2015-2016]). Potential population stratification was examined in the discovery cohort by principal component analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were computed for bleeding risk by logistic regression analysis. Summary

2018 JAMA

26. Rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome

Rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome Rivaroxaban is an effective and safe alternative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. We tested the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in high-risk patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome. This is a randomized open-label multicenter noninferiority study with blinded end point adjudication. Rivaroxaban, 20 mg once daily (15 mg once daily based (...) on kidney function) was compared with warfarin (international normalized ratio target 2.5) for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and vascular death in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Only high-risk patients triple positive for lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin, and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies of the same isotype (triple positivity) were included in the study. The trial was terminated prematurely after the enrollment of 120 patients (59 randomized to rivaroxaban

2018 EvidenceUpdates

27. New drugs for deep vein thrombosis may offer a safe alternative to warfarin

New drugs for deep vein thrombosis may offer a safe alternative to warfarin New drugs for deep vein thrombosis may offer a safe alternative to warfarin Discover Portal Discover Portal New drugs for deep vein thrombosis may offer a safe alternative to warfarin Published on 20 October 2015 doi: This Cochrane systematic review found that two new types of drugs taken by mouth for deep vein thrombosis were as effective as standard treatment, which most commonly involves treatment by injection (...) followed by warfarin tablets for at least three months. The new drugs have the advantage that they do not require monitoring or dose changes and were associated with a lower risk of bleeding. This high quality review was based on evidence from 11 good quality trials and can be considered reliable. This review did not look at overall cost or cost-effectiveness. NICE has conducted some assessments of individual drugs and is conducting further assessments. Each assessment has a costing tool or statement

2018 NIHR Dissemination Centre

28. Less abnormal uterine bleeding with dabigatran than warfarin in women treated for acute venous thromboembolism

Less abnormal uterine bleeding with dabigatran than warfarin in women treated for acute venous thromboembolism Essentials Factor Xa inhibitors cause more abnormal menstrual bleeding (AUB) than vitamin-K antagonists (VKA). We analyzed data of AUB in women, evaluating dabigatran versus VKA. We observed a 41% lower risk of AUB in women on dabigatran compared to those on VKA. Our findings of lower AUB risk on dabigatran should be corroborated in future studies.Introduction Although direct oral (...) anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with a better safety profile than warfarin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct factor Xa inhibitors involve a higher risk of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). We aimed to determine the risk of AUB during anticoagulation with dabigatran compared with warfarin. Methods Post-hoc analysis of the pooled RE-COVER studies and the RE-MEDY trial. Incidences of AUB, based on a defined preferred terms search for adverse events, in female patients aged 18-50

2018 EvidenceUpdates

29. Warfarin

Warfarin Top results for warfarin - Trip Database or use your Google+ account Liberating the literature ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 or #4 (...) ) Loading history... Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcome: Population: Intervention: Latest & greatest articles for warfarin The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted

2018 Trip Latest and Greatest

30. Self-monitoring of warfarin is safe and cost-effective

Self-monitoring of warfarin is safe and cost-effective Self-monitoring of warfarin is safe and cost-effective Discover Portal Discover Portal Self-monitoring of warfarin is safe and cost-effective Published on 21 August 2015 doi: This NIHR-funded systematic review investigated the clinical and cost-effectiveness of self-monitoring by people receiving long-term anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists, most commonly, warfarin. People receiving warfarin require regular blood tests to see how (...) their blood is clotting and to adjust their dose to avoid bleeding from too high a dose or thrombosis (clots) if the dose drops too low. This is usually done at their GP practice or in hospital clinics. Self-monitoring involves two aspects of care; people self-testing their blood on a machine at home and self-managing, adjusting their warfarin dosage themselves. This review found self-monitoring halved the number of blood clots compared with standard care. Health and social costs were more equal

2018 NIHR Dissemination Centre

31. Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care. (PubMed)

Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care. To investigate the associations between direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and risks of bleeding, ischaemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and all cause mortality compared with warfarin.Prospective open cohort study.UK general practices contributing to QResearch or Clinical Practice Research Datalink.132 231 warfarin, 7744 dabigatran, 37 863 rivaroxaban, and 18 223 apixaban (...) users without anticoagulant prescriptions for 12 months before study entry, subgrouped into 103 270 patients with atrial fibrillation and 92 791 without atrial fibrillation between 2011 and 2016.Major bleeding leading to hospital admission or death. Specific sites of bleeding and all cause mortality were also studied.In patients with atrial fibrillation, compared with warfarin, apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.54

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 BMJ

32. Direct acting oral anticoagulants likely to be better than warfarin for people taking them for atrial fibrillation

Direct acting oral anticoagulants likely to be better than warfarin for people taking them for atrial fibrillation Direct acting oral anticoagulants likely to be better than warfarin for people taking them for atrial fibrillation Discover Portal Discover Portal Direct acting oral anticoagulants likely to be better than warfarin for people taking them for atrial fibrillation Published on 6 February 2018 doi: In people with atrial fibrillation needing anticoagulant treatment, deaths were fewer (...) in those who had direct acting oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin. The picture is less clear for the risk of stroke and complications such as bleeding in the brain or gut. Apixaban had the best efficacy and safety profile and was cost-effective compared with warfarin. This study pooled the data in all trials reporting efficacy, safety and cost of anticoagulant prevention of stroke events in people with atrial fibrillation. Researchers used a technique called network meta-analysis to compare

2018 NIHR Dissemination Centre

33. New drugs for deep vein thrombosis may offer a safe alternative to warfarin

New drugs for deep vein thrombosis may offer a safe alternative to warfarin New drugs for deep vein thrombosis may offer a safe alternative to warfarin Discover Portal Discover Portal New drugs for deep vein thrombosis may offer a safe alternative to warfarin Published on 20 October 2015 doi: This Cochrane systematic review found that two new types of drugs taken by mouth for deep vein thrombosis were as effective as standard treatment, which most commonly involves treatment by injection (...) followed by warfarin tablets for at least three months. The new drugs have the advantage that they do not require monitoring or dose changes and were associated with a lower risk of bleeding. This high quality review was based on evidence from 11 good quality trials and can be considered reliable. This review did not look at overall cost or cost-effectiveness. NICE has conducted some assessments of individual drugs and is conducting further assessments. Each assessment has a costing tool or statement

2018 NIHR Dissemination Centre

34. New generation anticoagulants may be safer than warfarin for people with chronic kidney disease

New generation anticoagulants may be safer than warfarin for people with chronic kidney disease New generation anticoagulants may be safer than warfarin for people with chronic kidney disease Discover Portal Discover Portal New generation anticoagulants may be safer than warfarin for people with chronic kidney disease Published on 26 April 2016 doi: Newer generation anticoagulants appear to reduce the risk of bleeding compared with older anticoagulants like warfarin, when used to prevent clots (...) in people who also have mild to moderate chronic kidney disease. This group of drugs, called direct oral anticoagulants, have been well researched in healthy people with atrial fibrillation or at risk of thromboembolism but this was the first review to look at their safety, in terms of bleeding and risk of bleeding within the brain, in people with kidney disease. As a group, these newer drugs appear safer than older anticoagulants such as warfarin. Evidence from the trials comparing individual new

2018 NIHR Dissemination Centre

35. Self-monitoring of warfarin is safe and cost-effective

Self-monitoring of warfarin is safe and cost-effective Self-monitoring of warfarin is safe and cost-effective Discover Portal Discover Portal Self-monitoring of warfarin is safe and cost-effective Published on 21 August 2015 doi: This NIHR-funded systematic review investigated the clinical and cost-effectiveness of self-monitoring by people receiving long-term anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists, most commonly, warfarin. People receiving warfarin require regular blood tests to see how (...) their blood is clotting and to adjust their dose to avoid bleeding from too high a dose or thrombosis (clots) if the dose drops too low. This is usually done at their GP practice or in hospital clinics. Self-monitoring involves two aspects of care; people self-testing their blood on a machine at home and self-managing, adjusting their warfarin dosage themselves. This review found self-monitoring halved the number of blood clots compared with standard care. Health and social costs were more equal

2018 NIHR Dissemination Centre

36. Dabigatran versus Warfarin for Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Elderly or Impaired Renal Function Patients: Pooled Analysis of RE-COVER and RE-COVER II

Dabigatran versus Warfarin for Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Elderly or Impaired Renal Function Patients: Pooled Analysis of RE-COVER and RE-COVER II Management of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) with anticoagulants in elderly patients and those with chronic kidney disease poses special challenges. The RE-COVER and RE-COVER II trials showed that dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was as effective as warfarin over 6 months in preventing recurrent VTE, with a lower bleeding risk. We now assess (...) and moderate RI, respectively (23 patients with severe RI and 49 with missing creatinine clearance data were not included). For dabigatran, VTE/VTE-related death decreased from 3.1% (normal renal function) to 1.9% for mild RI and to 0.0% for moderate RI. For warfarin, the event rates were 2.6, 1.6 and 4.1%, respectively. Overall, major bleeding increased with increasing RI (p = 0.0037) and with age (p = 0.4350), with no apparent difference between the dabigatran and warfarin patients. Dabigatran shows

2018 EvidenceUpdates

37. Comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation (PubMed)

Comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation Randomized clinical trials comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin in cancer patients have not been performed. We evaluated the effectiveness and associated risk of DOACs vs warfarin, as well as comparisons of DOACs, in a large population of cancer patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Using the MarketScan databases, we identified 16 096 AF patients (...) (mean age, 74 years) initiating oral anticoagulant and being actively treated for cancer between 2010 and 2014. Anticoagulant users were matched by age, sex, enrollment date, and drug initiation date. Study end points were identified with diagnostic codes and included ischemic stroke, severe bleeding, other bleeding, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Cox regression was used to estimate associations of anticoagulants with study end points. Compared with warfarin, rates of bleeding (hazard ratio [95

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 Blood advances

38. Direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin for A fib?

Direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin for A fib? Direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin for A fib? Toggle navigation Shared more. Cited more. Safe forever. Toggle navigation View Item JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it. Search MOspace This Collection Browse Statistics Direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin for A fib? View/ Open Date 2017-08 Format Metadata Abstract A recent study evaluated the effectiveness of 3 direct oral (...) anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. So which agents came out on top? PRACTICE CHANGER: Use direct oral anticoagulants instead of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation because they are just as effective at preventing ischemic stroke and systemic emboli as warfarin, and because apixaban and dabigatran have lower bleeding rates. Stength of recommendation: B: Based on a single, prospective, cohort study. URI Part of Citation Journal of Family Practice, 66(8) 2017: 518-520

2018 PURLS

39. Rivaroxaban dose adjustment using thrombin generation in severe congenital protein C deficiency and warfarin-induced skin necrosis (PubMed)

Rivaroxaban dose adjustment using thrombin generation in severe congenital protein C deficiency and warfarin-induced skin necrosis 29365322 2019 01 30 2019 01 30 2473-9537 2 2 2018 01 23 Blood advances Blood Adv Rivaroxaban dose adjustment using thrombin generation in severe congenital protein C deficiency and warfarin-induced skin necrosis. 142-145 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017012047 Menon Neethu N Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, and. Sarode Ravi R Department (...) of Pathology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Zia Ayesha A 0000-0003-3283-0415 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, and. eng K23 HL132054 HL NHLBI NIH HHS United States Case Reports Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural United States Blood Adv 101698425 2473-9529 0 Protein C 0 Thrombomodulin 5Q7ZVV76EI Warfarin 9NDF7JZ4M3 Rivaroxaban EC 3.4.21.5 Thrombin IM Adolescent Female Humans Necrosis chemically induced pathology prevention

Full Text available with Trip Pro

2018 Blood advances

40. Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and a History of Cancer: Observations from ROCKET AF. (PubMed)

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and a History of Cancer: Observations from ROCKET AF. The management of anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer is challenging due to increased thrombotic and bleeding risks. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients with AF and a history of cancer.ROCKET AF randomized 14,264 patients with AF to rivaroxaban or warfarin (...) with a median follow-up of 1.9 years. Cox regression models were used to assess the association between cancer history and clinical outcomes, and the relative treatment effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in these patients. A total of 640 patients enrolled in ROCKET AF had a history of cancer, with the most common types being prostate (28.6%), colorectal (16.1%), and breast (14.7%) cancer. Patients with a history of cancer were older, more frequently male, more likely to have prior VKA use, and had higher

2018 European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes