Latest & greatest articles for mammography

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on mammography or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on mammography and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for mammography

22. Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women atless than high risk for breast cancer: a health technology assessment

Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women atless than high risk for breast cancer: a health technology assessment Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: a health technology assessment Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: a health technology assessment (...) Health Quality Ontario Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Health Quality Ontario. Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: a health technology assessment. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario (HQO). Ontario health technology assessment series

2017 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

23. Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: OHTAC recommendation

Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: OHTAC recommendation Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: OHTAC recommendation Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: OHTAC recommendation Health Quality Ontario Record (...) Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Health Quality Ontario. Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in women at less than high risk for breast cancer: OHTAC recommendation. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario (HQO). 2016 Authors' conclusions The Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee (OHTAC

2017 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

24. Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer

Magnetic Resonance Imaging as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Less Than High Risk for Breast Cancer Health Technology Assessment - Health Quality Ontario (HQO) Let's make our health system healthier Open Menu Quick Links Search Search A A A Evidence to Improve Care Share: Health Technology Assessment To continuously improve the quality of health care in Ontario, we use established scientific methods to analyze evidence and develop assessments of new

2016 Health Quality Ontario

25. Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness. The goal of screening mammography is to detect small malignant tumors before they grow large enough to cause symptoms. Effective screening should therefore lead to the detection of a greater number of small tumors, followed by fewer large tumors over time.We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, 1975 through 2012, to calculate the tumor-size distribution and size-specific (...) incidence of breast cancer among women 40 years of age or older. We then calculated the size-specific cancer case fatality rate for two time periods: a baseline period before the implementation of widespread screening mammography (1975 through 1979) and a period encompassing the most recent years for which 10 years of follow-up data were available (2000 through 2002).After the advent of screening mammography, the proportion of detected breast tumors that were small (invasive tumors measuring <2 cm

2016 NEJM

26. Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: OHTAC recommendation

Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: OHTAC recommendation Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: OHTAC recommendation Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: OHTAC recommendation Health Quality Ontario Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation (...) Health Quality Ontario. Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: OHTAC recommendation. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario (HQO). 2016 Authors' conclusions The Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee recommends publicly funding screening breast ultrasound as an adjunct to screening mammography for high-risk women in whom magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is contraindicated. The Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee recommends against publicly funding screening

2016 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

27. Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: a health technology assessment

Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: a health technology assessment Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: a health technology assessment Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: a health technology assessment Health Quality Ontario Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made (...) for the HTA database. Citation Health Quality Ontario. Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: a health technology assessment. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario (HQO). Ontario health technology assessment series; 16(15). 2016 Authors' conclusions We found no evidence that evaluated the comparative effectiveness or diagnostic accuracy of screening breast ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography among average-risk women aged 50 years and over. In women at high risk of developing

2016 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

28. The impacts of public mammography screening on the relationship between socioeconomic status and cancer stage Full Text available with Trip Pro

The impacts of public mammography screening on the relationship between socioeconomic status and cancer stage This study aimed to investigate the relationship between socioeconomic inequality and mortality following the introduction of a public mammography screening program in Norway by exploring the role of change in stage distribution as the mechanism for differences before and after the introduction of the screening program. Attained education level was used as a measure of socioeconomic (...) with primary school of -1.8 (-2.2 to -1.4) and -0.7 (-0.9 to -0.5) fewer deaths in favor of women with university education and secondary school, respectively. The results indicate reduced importance of cancer stage as a reason for differences in mortality by socioeconomic status after the introduction of a public mammography program.

2016 SSM - population health

29. Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening

Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening Health Quality Ontario The provincial advisor on the quality of health care in Ontario Let’s make our health system healthier Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: OHTAC Recommendation ONTARIO HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS ? The Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee recommends publicly funding screening breast ultrasound as an adjunct to screening mammography for high (...) -risk women in whom magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is contraindicated. ? The Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee recommends against publicly funding screening breast ultrasound as an adjunct to screening mammography in women at average risk for breast cancer. RATIONALE FOR THE RECOMMENDATION DECISION Given the absence of evidence demonstrating benefit, 1 there was consensus among members of the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee (OHTAC) that adjunct screening breast ultrasound

2016 Health Quality Ontario

30. Cost-Effectiveness of Three Rounds of Mammography Breast Cancer Screening in Iranian Women Full Text available with Trip Pro

Cost-Effectiveness of Three Rounds of Mammography Breast Cancer Screening in Iranian Women Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Iranian women as is worldwide. Mammography screening has been introduced as a beneficial method for reducing mortality and morbidity of this disease.We developed an analytical model to assess the cost effectiveness of an organized mammography screening program in Iran for early detection of the breast cancer.This study is an economic evaluation of mammography (...) screening program among Iranian woman aged 40 - 70 years. A decision tree and Markov model were applied to estimate total quality adjusted life years (QALY) and lifetime costs.The results revealed that the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of mammography screening in Iranian women in the first round was Int. $ 37,350 per QALY gained. The model showed that the ICER in the second and third rounds of screening program were Int. $ 141,641 and Int. $ 389,148 respectively.Study results identified

2016 Iranian journal of cancer prevention

31. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study. Estimates of risk for radiation-induced breast cancer from mammography screening have not considered variation in dose exposure or diagnostic work-up after abnormal screening results.To estimate distributions of radiation-induced breast cancer incidence and mortality from digital mammography screening while considering exposure from screening and diagnostic mammography and dose (...) variation among women.2 simulation-modeling approaches.U.S. population.Women aged 40 to 74 years.Annual or biennial digital mammography screening from age 40, 45, or 50 years until age 74 years.Lifetime breast cancer deaths averted (benefits) and radiation-induced breast cancer incidence and mortality (harms) per 100,000 women screened.Annual screening of 100,000 women aged 40 to 74 years was projected to induce 125 breast cancer cases (95% CI, 88 to 178) leading to 16 deaths (CI, 11 to 23), relative

2016 Annals of Internal Medicine

32. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data. Women screened with digital mammography may receive false-positive and false-negative results and subsequent imaging and biopsies. How these outcomes vary by age, time since the last screening, and individual risk factors is unclear.To determine factors associated with false-positive and false-negative digital mammography results, additional imaging (...) , and biopsies among a general population of women screened for breast cancer.Analysis of registry data.Participating facilities at 5 U.S. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium breast imaging registries with linkages to pathology databases and tumor registries.405,191 women aged 40 to 89 years screened with digital mammography between 2003 and 2011. A total of 2963 were diagnosed with invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ within 12 months of screening.Rates of false-positive and false-negative results

2016 Annals of Internal Medicine

33. Recall Rates for Digital Mammography for Patients Undergoing Screening for Breast Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines

Recall Rates for Digital Mammography for Patients Undergoing Screening for Breast Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines Recall Rates for Digital Mammography for Patients Undergoing Screening for Breast Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines | CADTH.ca Find the information you need Recall Rates for Digital Mammography for Patients Undergoing Screening for Breast Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines Recall Rates for Digital Mammography for Patients Undergoing Screening for Breast Cancer: Evidence-Based (...) Guidelines Published on: September 30, 2015 Project Number: RB0917-000 Product Line: Research Type: Devices and Systems Report Type: Summary of Abstracts Result type: Report Question What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding appropriate recall for patients undergoing digital mammography for breast cancer screening? Key Message No relevant evidence-based guidelines were identified regarding appropriate recall for patients undergoing digital mammography for breast cancer screening. Tags false

2015 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health - Rapid Review

34. Breast cancer screening and mammography: inform women

Breast cancer screening and mammography: inform women Prescrire IN ENGLISH - Spotlight ''Breast cancer screening and mammography: inform women '', 1 July 2015 {1} {1} {1} | | > > > Breast cancer screening and mammography: inform women Spotlight Every month, the subjects in Prescrire’s Spotlight. 100 most recent :  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |  Spotlight Breast cancer screening and mammography: inform women Information (...) must be shared with women to help them decide whether or not to take part in breast cancer screening. In a series of articles published over the past year, Prescrire updated its analysis of the harm-benefit balance of breast cancer screening by mammography. In France, it is estimated that, overall, for every 1000 woman aged 50, around 72 women are diagnosed with breast cancer over a period of 20 years. In the 10 years following this diagnosis, around 13 of these women die from breast cancer, and 4

2015 Prescrire

35. Tomosynthesis (3D Mammography) for Breast Cancer Screening

Tomosynthesis (3D Mammography) for Breast Cancer Screening 1 Issue 135 ? May 2015 Issues in Emerging Health Technologies Summary ? Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a novel imaging technology that captures three- dimensional (3D) images of the breast. ? DBT can be used for screening or diagnosis. ? Seven recent, large screening studies that each enrolled more than 10,000 women showed that DBT can reduce the need to recall women for further testing compared with current two- dimensional (2D (...) Traditional two-dimensional (2D) mammography captures two static images of the breast. One particular shortcoming of 2D technology is the overlapping of breast images that can decrease accuracy of interpretation. With digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), an X-ray beam sweeps in an arc of 15 to 50 degrees (depending on the manufacturer) across the breast, and an electronic detector digitally captures between nine and 25 X-ray projection images. 1-6 These images are generally captured in two views

2015 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health - Rapid Review

36. Tomosynthesis (3D Mammography) for Breast Cancer Screening

Tomosynthesis (3D Mammography) for Breast Cancer Screening Tomosynthesis (3D Mammography) for Breast Cancer Screening | CADTH.ca Find the information you need Tomosynthesis (3D Mammography) for Breast Cancer Screening Tomosynthesis (3D Mammography) for Breast Cancer Screening Published on: May 13, 2015 Project Number: EH0026 Product Line: Issue: 135 Result type: Report Summary Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a novel imaging technology that captures three-dimensional (3D) images (...) detection. Implementation issues include the significant cost to purchase the technology, training requirements for radiologists and technologists, increased radiologist interpretation time, and greater data storage requirements. The Technology Traditional two-dimensional (2D) mammography captures two static images of the breast. One particular shortcoming of 2D technology is the overlapping of breast images that can decrease accuracy of interpretation. With digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), an X-ray

2015 CADTH - Issues in Emerging Health Technologies

37. Concurrent versus Sequential Digital Mammography and MRI for Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Patients

Concurrent versus Sequential Digital Mammography and MRI for Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Patients Disclaimer: The Rapid Response Service is an information service for those involved in planning and providing health care in Canada. Rapid responses are based on a limited literature search and are not comprehensive, systematic reviews. The intent is to provide a list of sources of the best evidence on the topic that CADTH could identify using all reasonable efforts within the time allowed (...) Sequential Digital Mammography and MRI for Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Patients: Comparative Clinical Effectiveness, Cost- Effectiveness, and Guidelines DATE: 06 May 2015 RESEARCH QUESTIONS 1. What is the comparative clinical effectiveness of concurrent versus sequential digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for breast cancer screening in high-risk patients? 2. What is the comparative cost-effectiveness of concurrent versus sequential digital mammography and MRI for breast

2015 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health - Rapid Review

38. Full-field digital mammography for breast cancer screening

Full-field digital mammography for breast cancer screening Full-field digital mammography for breast cancer screening Full-field digital mammography for breast cancer screening HAYES, Inc. Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation HAYES, Inc.. Full-field digital mammography for breast cancer screening. Lansdale: HAYES, Inc.. Directory Publication. 2015 (...) Final publication URL The report may be purchased from: Indexing Status Subject indexing assigned by CRD MeSH Breast Neoplasms; Early Detection of Cancer; Humans; Mammography Language Published English Country of organisation United States English summary An English language summary is available. Address for correspondence HAYES, Inc., 157 S. Broad Street, Suite 200, Lansdale, PA 19446, USA. Tel: 215 855 0615; Fax: 215 855 5218 Email: hayesinfo@hayesinc.com AccessionNumber 32016000106 Date abstract

2015 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.

39. Management of Women With Dense Breasts Diagnosed by Mammography

Management of Women With Dense Breasts Diagnosed by Mammography Management of Women With Dense Breasts Diagnosed by Mammography - ACOG Menu ▼ Management of Women With Dense Breasts Diagnosed by Mammography Page Navigation ▼ A correction was published in January 2016 for this title. Click to view the correction. Number 625, March 2015 (Reaffirmed 2019) Committee on Gynecologic Practice This document reflects emerging clinical and scientific advances as of the date issued and is subject to change (...) . The information should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Management of Women With Dense Breasts Diagnosed by Mammography ABSTRACT: Women with dense breasts have a modestly increased risk of breast cancer and experience reduced sensitivity of mammography to detect breast cancer. However, evidence is lacking to advocate for additional testing until there are clinically validated data that indicate improved screening outcomes. Currently, screening

2015 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

40. Use of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening or Diagnosis

Use of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening or Diagnosis Use of digital breast tomosynthesis with mammography for breast cancer screening or diagnosis Use of digital breast tomosynthesis with mammography for breast cancer screening or diagnosis BlueCross BlueShield Association Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation (...) BlueCross BlueShield Association. Use of digital breast tomosynthesis with mammography for breast cancer screening or diagnosis. Chicago: BlueCross BlueShield Association (BCBS). TEC Assessment 28(6). 2014 Final publication URL Indexing Status Subject indexing assigned by CRD MeSH Breast Neoplasmss; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Mammography; Mass Screening Language Published English Country of organisation United States English summary An English language summary is available. Address for correspondence

2014 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.