Latest & greatest articles for prostate cancer screening

The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on prostate cancer screening or other clinical topics then use Trip today.

This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on prostate cancer screening and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.

What is Trip?

Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.

Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.

As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.

For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via jon.brassey@tripdatabase.com

Top results for prostate cancer screening

1. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent - PubMed This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. COVID (...) : 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Affiliations Expand Affiliations 1 Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France. Electronic address: nicolas.mottet@chu-st-etienne.fr. 2 Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3 Hasselt, Belgium. 4 Department

2021 EvidenceUpdates

2. Prostate cancer screening with the PSA test

Prostate cancer screening with the PSA test 1 Translation of Chapters 1 to 6 of the final report S19-01 Prostatakrebsscreening mittels PSA-Test (Version 1.0; Status: 24 April 2020 [German original], 10 June 2020 [English translation]). Please note: This document was translated by an external translator and is provided as a service by IQWiG to English-language readers. However, solely the German original text is absolutely authoritative and legally binding. Extract IQWiG Reports – Commission (...) No. S19-01 Prostate cancer screening with a PSA test 1 Extract of final report S19-01 Version 1.0 PSA screening 24 April 2020 Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) - i - Publishing details Publisher: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care Topic: Prostate cancer screening with a PSA test Commissioning agency: Federal Joint Committee Commission awarded on: 18 April 2019 Internal Commission No.: S19-01 Address of publisher: Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit

2020 Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare (IQWiG)

3. A 16-yr Follow-up of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Full Text available with Trip Pro

A 16-yr Follow-up of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer The European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) has previously demonstrated that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening decreases prostate cancer (PCa) mortality.To determine whether PSA screening decreases PCa mortality for up to 16yr and to assess results following adjustment for nonparticipation and the number of screening rounds attended.This multicentre population-based randomised (...) significantly reduces PCa mortality, showing larger absolute benefit with longer follow-up and a reduction in excess incidence. Repeated screening may be important to reduce PCa mortality on a population level.In this report, we looked at the outcomes from prostate cancer in a large European population. We found that repeated screening reduces the risk of dying from prostate cancer.Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

2019 EvidenceUpdates

4. Results of Prostate Cancer Screening in a Unique Cohort at 19yr of Follow-up (Abstract)

Results of Prostate Cancer Screening in a Unique Cohort at 19yr of Follow-up We assessed the effect of screening in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Rotterdam pilot 1 study cohort with men randomized in 1991-1992. A total of 1134 men were randomized on a 1:1 basis to a screening (S) and control (C) arm after prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing (PSA ≥10.0ng/ml was excluded from randomization). Further PSA testing was offered to all men in the S-arm (...) with 4-yr intervals starting at age 55yr and screened up to the age of 74yr. Overall, a PSA level of ≥3.0ng/ml triggered biopsy. At time of analysis, 63% of men had died. Overall relative risk of metastatic (M+) disease and prostate cancer (PCa) death was 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-1.11) and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.17-1.36), respectively, in favor of screening. This ERSPC Rotterdam pilot 1 study cohort, screened in a period without noteworthy contamination, shows that PSA-based screening could

2019 EvidenceUpdates

5. Outcomes of Prostate-specific Antigen-based Prostate Cancer Screening Among Men Using Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs. (Abstract)

Outcomes of Prostate-specific Antigen-based Prostate Cancer Screening Among Men Using Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs. The Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC), the largest component of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), showed a smaller, nonsignificant reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality by systematic prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening compared with the overall ERSPC results. Nonsteroidal anti (...) -inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce inflammation and also PSA elevations due to intraprostatic inflammation.To explore whether NSAID usage modifies the effects of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer incidence and mortality.A cohort of 78 165 men from the FinRSPC were linked to a comprehensive national prescription database to obtain information on NSAID reimbursements prior to screening.Prostate cancer risk and mortality were compared between the FinRSPC screening arm and the control arm among NSAID

2018 European urology focus

6. Prostate cancer screening

Prostate cancer screening Top results for prostate cancer screening - Trip Database or use your Google+ account Turning Research Into Practice ALL of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document ANY of these words: Title only Anywhere in the document This EXACT phrase: Title only Anywhere in the document EXCLUDING words: Title only Anywhere in the document Timeframe: to: Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search (...) might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 or #4) Loading history... Population: Intervention: Comparison: Outcome: Population: Intervention: Latest & greatest articles for prostate cancer screening The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance

2018 Trip Latest and Greatest

7. Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. In the United States, the lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer is approximately 13%, and the lifetime risk of dying of prostate cancer is 2.5%. The median age of death from prostate cancer is 80 years. Many men with prostate cancer never experience symptoms and, without screening, would never know they have the disease. African American men and men with a family history of prostate cancer (...) have an increased risk of prostate cancer compared with other men.To update the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer.The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of PSA-based screening for prostate cancer and subsequent treatment of screen-detected prostate cancer. The USPSTF also commissioned a review of existing decision analysis models and the overdiagnosis rate of PSA-based screening

2018 JAMA

8. Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial. Prostate cancer screening remains controversial because potential mortality or quality-of-life benefits may be outweighed by harms from overdetection and overtreatment.To evaluate the effect of a single prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening intervention and standardized diagnostic pathway on prostate cancer-specific mortality.The Cluster Randomized Trial of PSA Testing (...) stage and Gleason grade (range, 2-10; higher scores indicate a poorer prognosis) of prostate cancers identified, all-cause mortality, and an instrumental variable analysis estimating the causal effect of attending the PSA screening clinic.Among 415 357 randomized men (mean [SD] age, 59.0 [5.6] years), 189 386 in the intervention group and 219 439 in the control group were included in the analysis (n = 408 825; 98%). In the intervention group, 75 707 (40%) attended the PSA testing clinic and 67 313

2018 JAMA Controlled trial quality: predicted high

9. Polygenic hazard score to guide screening for aggressive prostate cancer: development and validation in large scale cohorts. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Polygenic hazard score to guide screening for aggressive prostate cancer: development and validation in large scale cohorts. To develop and validate a genetic tool to predict age of onset of aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) and to guide decisions of who to screen and at what age.Analysis of genotype, PCa status, and age to select single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with diagnosis. These polymorphisms were incorporated into a survival analysis to estimate their effects on age (...) at diagnosis of aggressive PCa (that is, not eligible for surveillance according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines; any of Gleason score ≥7, stage T3-T4, PSA (prostate specific antigen) concentration ≥10 ng/L, nodal metastasis, distant metastasis). The resulting polygenic hazard score is an assessment of individual genetic risk. The final model was applied to an independent dataset containing genotype and PSA screening data. The hazard score was calculated for these men to test prediction

2018 BMJ

10. Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test Full Text available with Trip Pro

Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a clinical practice guideline | The BMJ Intended for healthcare professionals Username * Password * Edition: Search form Search Search Prostate cancer... Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a clinical practice guideline CC BY NC Open access (Published 05 September 2018) Cite this as: BMJ 2018;362:k3581 Population Diagnostic (...) pathway for prostate cancer Localised Stage I or II Stage III or IV Advanced Abnormal biopsy and staging No cancer diagnosis Normal biopsy Still possible to have a biopsy and be diagnosed, based on clinical suspicion No Biopsy Biopsy Normal PSA Elevated PSA or Choices considered in this comparison Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening No PSA screening Width of lines proportional to approximate numbers of people Subsequent treatment Surgery Radiation Active surveillance With or without hormonal

2018 BMJ Rapid Recommendations

11. Prostate Cancer: Screening

Prostate Cancer: Screening Recommendation | United States Preventive Services Taskforce Toggle navigation Main navigation Main navigation Recommendation Men aged 55 to 69 years For men aged 55 to 69 years, the decision to undergo periodic prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer should be an individual one. Before deciding whether to be screened, men should have an opportunity to discuss the potential benefits and harms of screening with their clinician (...) and to incorporate their values and preferences in the decision. Screening offers a small potential benefit of reducing the chance of death from prostate cancer in some men. However, many men will experience potential harms of screening, including false-positive results that require additional testing and possible prostate biopsy; overdiagnosis and overtreatment; and treatment complications, such as incontinence and erectile dysfunction. In determining whether this service is appropriate in individual cases

2018 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

12. Screening for Prostate Cancer*

Screening for Prostate Cancer* Screening for Prostate Cancer | National Guideline Clearinghouse success fail JUL Aug 12 2018 2019 30 Sep 2016 - 13 Jul 2018 COLLECTED BY Organization: Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded (...) ? The AHRQ National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC, guideline.gov) Web site will not be available after July 16, 2018 because federal funding through AHRQ will no longer be available to support the NGC as of that date. For additional information, read our . Guideline Synthesis Screening for Prostate Cancer Guidelines Being Compared: American College of Physicians (ACP) Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. 2013 Apr

2018 National Guideline Clearinghouse (partial archive)

13. Reconciling the Effects of Screening on Prostate Cancer Mortality in the ERSPC and PLCO Trials. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Reconciling the Effects of Screening on Prostate Cancer Mortality in the ERSPC and PLCO Trials. The ERSPC (European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer) found that screening reduced prostate cancer mortality, but the PLCO (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial) found no reduction.To evaluate whether effects of screening on prostate cancer mortality relative to no screening differed between the ERSPC and PLCO.Cox regression of prostate cancer death in each (...) trial group, adjusted for age and trial. Extended analyses accounted for increased incidence due to screening and diagnostic work-up in each group via mean lead times (MLTs), which were estimated empirically and using analytic or microsimulation models.Randomized controlled trials in Europe and the United States.Men aged 55 to 69 (ERSPC) or 55 to 74 (PLCO) years at randomization.Prostate cancer screening.Prostate cancer incidence and survival from randomization; prostate cancer incidence

2017 Annals of Internal Medicine

14. Impact of Prostatic-specific Antigen Threshold and Screening Interval in Prostate Cancer Screening Outcomes: Comparing the Swedish and Finnish European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Centres. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Impact of Prostatic-specific Antigen Threshold and Screening Interval in Prostate Cancer Screening Outcomes: Comparing the Swedish and Finnish European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Centres. The European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer trial has shown a 21% reduction in prostate cancer (PC) mortality with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening. Sweden used a 2-yr screening interval and showed a larger mortality reduction than Finland with a 4-yr (...) between the Finnish and Swedish centres and estimated the impact of different screening protocols.If the Swedish screening protocol had been followed in Finland, 122 additional PC cases would have been diagnosed at screening, 84% of which would have been low-risk cancers, and four leading to PC death. In contrast, if a lower PSA threshold had been applied in Finland, at least 127 additional PC would have been found, with 19 PC deaths.The small number of deaths among cases that would have been

2017 European urology focus Controlled trial quality: uncertain

15. Prostate Cancer Screening

Prostate Cancer Screening Boîte à décision | Box details Back to the Decision boxes × My account Creating an account and signing in will allow you to keep your Decision box results and view them later. I do not have an account Provide some personal information and create a user account allowing to save your Decision box results and view them later. You can also: I already have an account Please enter your email address and password to access your profile and consult your decision boxes. Email (...) Password Stay logged in: Back to the Decision boxes × My account Creating an account and signing in will allow you to keep your Decision box results and view them later. Create an account Title Full Name Email * Choose a username Password * Please enter a password Repeat Password * Both passwords do not fit Prostate Cancer Screening, Choosing Whether or Not to Screen (New!) Prostate Cancer Screening Take notes Notepad A tool to keep notes and your questions to the health professional × Close × Would

2017 Cancer Council Australia

16. Prostate cancer screening and early diagnosis

Prostate cancer screening and early diagnosis Canadian Urological Association recommendations on prostate cancer screening and early diagnosis To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.0 or greater is installed. Besides, it's possible to , or you can view flippdf Either scripts and active content are not permitted to run or Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.0 or greater is not installed. Besides, it's possible to , or you can view flippdf

2017 Canadian Urological Association

17. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent Full Text available with Trip Pro

EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent To present a summary of the 2016 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU) - European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) - International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) Guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa).The working panel performed a literature review of the new data (...) guidelines endorsed by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and the International Society of Geriatric Oncology and reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. A full version is available from the EAU office and online (http://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/).The 2016 EAU-STRO-IOG Prostate Cancer (PCa) Guidelines present updated information on the diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer. In Northern and Western Europe, the number of men diagnosed

2016 EvidenceUpdates

18. Psychological Predictors of Prostate Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Men Over 50 Years of Age in Hamadan: Perceived Threat and Efficacy Full Text available with Trip Pro

Psychological Predictors of Prostate Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Men Over 50 Years of Age in Hamadan: Perceived Threat and Efficacy Prostate cancer is the fourth most common cancer worldwide and is the second most lethal cancer.The aim of this study was to investigate psychological predictors of prostate cancer screening behaviors among men over 50 years of age in Hamadan.This cross-sectional study was carried out on 200 men over 50 years of age in Hamadan, west of Iran. Participants were (...) recruited with a cluster sampling method. The subjects completed a self-administered questionnaire including demographic characteristics, prostate cancer screening behaviors and psychological factors related to prostate cancer. Data was analyzed by SPSS-18 using chi-square, fisher exact test, and logestic regression.According to the results, 8.5 and 7.5 percent of participants reported history of digital rectal exam and prostate-specific antigen test, respectively. Also, the subjects reported 18.5

2016 Iranian journal of cancer prevention

19. Prostate Cancer Incidence and PSA Testing Patterns in Relation to USPSTF Screening Recommendations. Full Text available with Trip Pro

Prostate Cancer Incidence and PSA Testing Patterns in Relation to USPSTF Screening Recommendations. Prostate cancer incidence in men 75 years and older substantially decreased following the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation against prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for this age group. It is unknown whether incidence has changed since the USPSTF recommendation against screening for all men in May 2012.To examine recent changes in stage-specific prostate (...) cancer incidence and PSA screening rates following the 2008 and 2012 USPSTF recommendations.Ecologic study of age-standardized prostate cancer incidence (newly diagnosed cases/100,000 men aged ≥50 years) by stage from 2005 through 2012 using data from 18 population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries and PSA screening rate in the past year among men 50 years and older without a history of prostate cancer who responded to the 2005 (n = 4580), 2008 (n = 3476), 2010 (n

2015 JAMA

20. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)?based population screening for prostate cancer: an economic analysis

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)?based population screening for prostate cancer: an economic analysis Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)–based population screening for prostate cancer: an economic analysis Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)–based population screening for prostate cancer: an economic analysis Tawfik A Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA (...) database. Citation Tawfik A. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)–based population screening for prostate cancer: an economic analysis. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario (HQO). Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series; 15(11). 2015 Authors' conclusions PSA screening is associated with significant costs to the health care system when the cost of the PSA test itself is considered in addition to the costs of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of screen-detected PCs. Final publication URL Indexing Status

2015 Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Database.