Combine searches by placing the search numbers in the top search box and pressing the search button. An example search might look like (#1 or #2) and (#3 or #4)
Latest & greatest articles for prostate cancer
The Trip Database is a leading resource to help health professionals find trustworthy answers to their clinical questions. Users can access the latest research evidence and guidance to answer their clinical questions. We have a large collection of systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, regulatory guidance, clinical trials and many other forms of evidence. If you wanted the latest trusted evidence on prostate cancer or other clinical topics then use Trip today.
This page lists the very latest high quality evidence on prostate cancer and also the most popular articles. Popularity measured by the number of times the articles have been clicked on by fellow users in the last twelve months.
What is Trip?
Trip is a clinical search engine designed to allow users to quickly and easily find and use high-quality research evidence to support their practice and/or care.
Trip has been online since 1997 and in that time has developed into the internet’s premier source of evidence-based content. Our motto is ‘Find evidence fast’ and this is something we aim to deliver for every single search.
As well as research evidence we also allow clinicians to search across other content types including images, videos, patient information leaflets, educational courses and news.
For further information on Trip click on any of the questions/sections on the left-hand side of this page. But if you still have questions please contact us via email@example.com
imaging (MRI), bone scan, and computed tomography, are often also performed, especially in men presenting with higher risk disease, to check for disease spread. Screening controversy For many reasons, PSA screening remains controversial. Advocates often base their opinions on the European Randomised study of Screening for ProstateCancer (ERSPC), which suggests that screening may reduce the long term risk of prostatecancer-specific mortality by at least 9% (relative reduction). They also note (...) that substantial observational evidence indicates a reduction in advanced disease and reduction in prostatecancer mortality, which they attribute to the introduction of PSA screening. Opponents of PSA screening highlight the indolent natural course of prostatecancer, citing systematic reviews that reported little or no impact of PSA screening on overall and prostatecancer-specific mortality. Opponents also suggest that the harms and burden from overdiagnosis and overtreatment resulting in unnecessary
the disease, while preserving continence and, if possible, potency  (B0001). Radiation therapy (RT) is another definitive treatment strategy in which a therapeutic dose of radi- ation is delivered to the tumour (either as external beam, brachytherapy, or a combination of both) while minimising the radiation to normal tissue. External beam RT (EBRT) utilises an external source of radiation to treat the prostate gland and a margin of adjacent normal tissue. Brachy- therapy directly implants a radioactive (...) source within the prostate, thus providing the highest dose of radiation. Its aim is to maximise irradiation of the tumour while minimising radiation to normal tissue  (B0001). Health problem PCa is the most common non-skin cancer in men in Europe . Localised PCa is often indolent, and has no impact on health, even without treatment [12-14] (A0002). The incidence of PCa is higher in Northern and Western Europe compared with other areas of Europe, whereas incidence rates in Eastern and Southern
cancer. Sydney: Cancer Council Australia. [Version URL: , cited 2019 May 26]. Available from: . Management of locally advanced and metastatic prostatecancer Contents Download Clinical questions: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) Radiotherapy Radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) Surgery Surgery plus androgen deprivation therapy Pathologic T3/T4 disease post radical surgery (Patients with extra capsular extension, seminal vesicle involvement or positive surgical margins) Node-positive (...) Management of locally advanced and metastatic prostatecancer Management of locally advanced and metastatic prostatecancer - Cancer Guidelines Wiki Skip Links Personal tools Search Navigation Cancer Council guidelines Methodology Hosted cancer guidelines Adolescents and Young Adult (AYA) guidelines Prevention Policies Social links Page actions Cite this guideline Cancer Council Australia Advanced ProstateCancer Guidelines Working Party. Management of locally advanced and metastatic prostate
common types of cancer that affects men. In the United States, the lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostatecancer is approximately 11%, and the lifetime risk of dying of prostatecancer is 2.5%. Many men with prostatecancer never experience symptoms and, without screening, would never know they have the disease. In autopsy studies of men who died of other causes, more than 20% of men aged 50 to 59 years and more than 33% of men aged 70 to 79 years were found to have prostatecancer. In some (...) . The CAP trial was a cluster-randomized trial of a single invitation to PSA-based screening in the United Kingdom among 415,357 men. Overall, 34% of invited men received a valid PSA screening test. After a median follow-up of 10 years, there was no significant difference in prostatecancer mortality between the invited group and the control group (absolute risk, 0.30 per 1000 person-years vs 0.31 per 1000 person-years, respectively). Based on clinical stage, tumor grade, and PSA level, prostatecancer
Post-treatment impact and needs of prostatecancer survivors in Malaysia; a qualitative study There are limited studies conducted on the needs of cancer survivors in developing countries like Malaysia. This qualitative study aimed at exploring the post-treatment impact and needs of prostatecancer survivors.A qualitative study design was used. One in-depth interview and four focus group discussions were conducted with 24 prostatecancer survivors (age range: 58-79 years) from government (...) and private hospitals in Malaysia in 2013. Trained researchers used a topic guide to guide the interviews, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, checked and managed with Nvivo 10 software. A thematic approach was used to analyse the data.Three main themes emerged from the analysis: (a) impact of prostatecancer on the survivors, (b) support needed for coping and (c) information needs. Prostatecancer has an important impact on the survivors' lifestyle after treatment. Some of them have to live
Outcomes and toxicity from a prospective study of moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostatecancer The purpose of this study is to report the long-term outcomes and toxicity results of a prospective trial of moderately hypofractionated, image guided radiation therapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer.Patients were enrolled between December 2006 and February 2012. Patients in group 1 were stage T1-T2b, had a Gleason score (GS) of 2 to 6 or 7 (3 + 4) with only 1 lobe involved (...) , and had prostate-specific antigen levels ≤10 ng/mL. Group 2 patients were stage ≥T2c, had a GS ≥7 (4 + 3), a GS 7 (3 + 4) involving both lobes, or a PSA >10 ng/mL and ≤30 ng/mL. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasound guided fiducial (Visicoil) placement prior to computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging simulation. Daily cone beam computed tomography with online correction was used. The prescribed dose was 64 Gy in 20 fractions. The primary endpoint was acute and late toxicity
Destroying the androgen receptor (AR)-potential strategy to treat advanced prostatecancer 29344555 2018 11 13 2331-4737 4 11-12 2017 Nov Oncoscience Oncoscience Destroying the androgen receptor (AR)-potential strategy to treat advanced prostatecancer. 175-177 10.18632/oncoscience.389 Narayanan Ramesh R University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. Ponnusamy Suriyan S University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. Miller Duane D DD University of Tennessee (...) Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. eng Editorial 2017 12 28 United States Oncoscience 101636666 2331-4737 androgen receptor castration-resistant prostatecancer (CRPC) selective androgen receptor degraders (SARDs) ubiquitin proteasome pathway CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Ramesh Narayanan is a consultant of GTx, Inc. 2017 11 16 2017 11 16 2018 1 19 6 0 2018 1 19 6 0 2018 1 19 6 1 epublish 29344555 10.18632/oncoscience.389 389 PMC5769981 Elife. 2013 Apr 09;2:e00499 23580326 Science. 2009 May 8;324(5928
Superior metastasis-free survival for patients with high-risk prostatecancer treated with definitive radiation therapy compared to radical prostatectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis For high-risk prostatecancer (HR-PCa) in men with a life expectancy of at least 10 years, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends radiation therapy (RT) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with category 1 evidence or radical prostatectomy (RP) as an acceptable initial therapy. Randomized (...) evidence regarding which therapy is optimal for disease control is lacking for men with HR-PCa. We performed a propensity-score-matched comparison of outcomes for men with localized HR-PCa treated with primary RT or RP.The medical records of patients with localized HR-PCa who were treated at our institution between 2002 and 2011 were reviewed. Patient and disease characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes were collected. A combination of nearest-neighbor propensity score matching on age, Adult
Risk factors involved in treatment delays and differences in treatment type for patients with prostatecancer by risk category in an academic safety net hospital Understanding the drivers of delays from diagnosis to treatment can elucidate how to reduce the time to treatment (TTT) in patients with prostatecancer. In addition, the available treatments depending on the stage of cancer can vary widely for many reasons. This study investigated the relationship of TTT and treatment choice (...) with sociodemographic factors in patients with prostatecancer who underwent external beam radiation therapy (RT), radical prostatectomy (RP), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), or active surveillance (AS) at a safety-net academic medical center.A retrospective review was performed on 1088 patients who were diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostatecancer between January 2005 and December 2013. Demographic data as well as data on TTT, initial treatment choice, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, and National
Effect of Comorbidity on ProstateCancer-Specific Mortality: A Prospective Observational Study Purpose To determine the effect of comorbidity on prostatecancer (PCa)-specific mortality across treatment types. Patients and Methods These are the results of a population-based observational study in Sweden from 1998 to 2012 of 118,543 men who were diagnosed with PCa with a median follow-up of 8.3 years (interquartile range, 5.2 to 11.5 years) until death from PCa or other causes. Patients were (...) categorized by patient characteristics (marital status, educational level) and tumor characteristics (serum prostate-specific antigen, tumor grade and clinical stage) and by treatment type (radical prostatectomy, radical radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and watchful waiting). Data were stratified by Charlson comorbidity index (0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3). Mortality from PCa and other causes and after stabilized inverse probability weighting adjustments for clinical patient and tumor characteristics
the Committee, issued a positive opinion for granting a marketing authorisation to Tookad on 14 September 2017. 2. Scientific discussion 2.1. Problem statement 2.1.1. Disease or condition Tookad is indicated as monotherapy for adult patients with previously untreated, unilateral, low-risk, adenocarcinoma of the prostate with a life expectancy = 10 years and: - Clinical stage T1c or T2a, - Gleason Score = 6, based on high-resolution biopsy strategies, - PSA = 10 ng/mL, - 3 positive cancer cores (...) Padeliporfin (Tookad) - prostatecancer / ProstaticNeoplasms 30 Churchill Place ? Canary Wharf ? London E14 5EU ? United Kingdom An agency of the European Union Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5520 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact 14 September 2017 EMA/644309/2017 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report TOOKAD International non-proprietary name: padeliporfin Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/004182/0000 Note Assessment report
Risk of Cardiovascular Ischemic Events After Surgical Castration and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Therapy for ProstateCancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study Purpose Our aim was to determine whether cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients with prostatecancer (PCa) differs between those who receive androgen-deprivation therapy by surgical castration and those who receive gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) therapy. Patients and Methods By using the Taiwan National Health Insurance (...) of age, had hypertension, had a Charlson comorbidity index score ≥ 3, and had a previous history of MI, IS, or coronary heart disease. Conclusion Compared with bilateral orchiectomy, use of GnRHa does not increase the risk of CV ischemic events in patients with PCa. Nonetheless, orchiectomy is associated with higher rates of CV ischemic events in older patients and those with a history of CV comorbidities within 1.5 years of initiating androgen-deprivation therapy. These findings can help clinicians
Guideline for Optimization of Surgical and Pathological Quality Performance for Radical Prostatectomy in ProstateCancer Management | Cancer Care Ontario Google Tag Manager You are using an outdated browser. We suggest you update your browser for a better experience. for update. Browse Guidelines Browse Pathway Maps Sort by You are here / / Guideline for Optimization of Surgical and Pathological Quality Performance for Radical Prostatectomy in ProstateCancer Management Guidelines & Advice (...) Guideline for Optimization of Surgical and Pathological Quality Performance for Radical Prostatectomy in ProstateCancer Management english Version: 2 ID: 17-3 Oct 2017 Type of Content: Guidelines & Advice, Clinical Document Status: Current Authors: J. Chin, J. Srigley, L.A. Mayhew, R.B. Rumble, C. Crossley, A. Hunter, N. Fleshner, B. Bora, R. McLeod, S. McNair, B. Langer, A. Evans, ProstateCancer Surgery and Pathology Expert Panel Guideline Objective The objective of this document is to provide
Comparative Analysis of Biopsy Upgrading in Four ProstateCancer Active Surveillance Cohorts. Active surveillance (AS) is increasingly accepted for managing low-risk prostatecancer, yet there is no consensus about implementation. This lack of consensus is due in part to uncertainty about risks for disease progression, which have not been systematically compared or integrated across AS studies with variable surveillance protocols and dropout to active treatment.To compare risks for upgrading (...) .2576 men aged 40 to 80 years with a GS between 2 and 6 and clinical stage T1 or T2 prostatecancer enrolled between 1995 and 2014.PSA levels and biopsy GSs.After variable surveillance intervals and competing treatments were accounted for, estimated risks for biopsy upgrading were similar in the PASS and UT studies but higher in UCSF and lower in JHU studies. All cohorts had a delay of 3 to 5 months in detecting upgrading with biennial biopsies starting after a first confirmatory biopsy versus
Health-related quality of life for immediate versus delayed androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with asymptomatic, non-curable prostatecancer (TROG 03.06 and VCOG PR 01-03 [TOAD]): a randomised, multicentre, non-blinded, phase 3 trial Androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with prostatecancer who have relapsed with rising prostate-specific antigen concentration only (PSA-only relapse), or with non-curable but asymptomatic disease at diagnosis, could adversely affect quality of life (...) at a time when the disease itself does not. We aimed to compare the effect of immediate versus delayed androgen-deprivation therapy on health-related quality of life over 5 years in men enrolled in the TOAD (Timing of Androgen Deprivation) trial.This randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial done in 29 public and private cancer centres across Australia, New Zealand, and Canada compared immediate with delayed androgen-deprivation therapy in men with PSA-only relapse after definitive treatment
Risk of Alzheimer's Disease Among Senior Medicare Beneficiaries Treated With Androgen Deprivation Therapy for ProstateCancer Purpose To assess the relative risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) among patients with prostatecancer who received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), after adjustment for other cancer therapies. Methods Data from demographics, survival, diagnoses codes, procedure codes, and other information about beneficiaries age 67 years or older in the Medicare claims database (...) was assessed to determine the unadjusted and adjusted risks of AD and of dementia from ADT. The prespecified survival analysis method was competing risk regression. Results Of the 1.2 million fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who developed prostatecancer in 2001 to 2014, 35% received ADT. Of these, 109,815 (8.9%) and 223,765 (18.8%) developed AD and dementia, respectively, and 26% to 33% died without either outcome. Unadjusted rates of AD and all-cause mortality per 1,000 patient-years were higher
Phase III Study Comparing a Reduced Dose of Cabazitaxel (20 mg/m2) and the Currently Approved Dose (25 mg/m2) in Postdocetaxel Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant ProstateCancer-PROSELICA Purpose Cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 (C25) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus mitoxantrone ( P < .001) in postdocetaxel patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostatecancer (mCRPC) in the phase III TROPIC study. The phase III PROSELICA study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (...) : NCT01308580) assessed the noninferiority of cabazitaxel 20 mg/m2 (C20) versus C25 in postdocetaxel patients with mCRPC. Methods Patients were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, measurability of disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and region, and randomly assigned to receive C20 or C25. To claim noninferiority of C20 (maintenance of ≥ 50% of the OS benefit of C25 v mitoxantrone in TROPIC) with 95% confidence level, the upper boundary
Adherence to Report and Patient Perception of an Interactive App for Managing Symptoms During Radiotherapy for ProstateCancer: Descriptive Study of Logged and Interview Data Patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostatecancer experience symptoms related to both the cancer itself and its treatment, and it is evident that patients with prostatecancer have unmet supportive care needs related to their disease. Over the past decade, there has been an increase in the amount of research within (...) and not particularly time-consuming to send a daily report, and many described it as becoming a routine. Reporting symptoms facilitated reflection on their symptoms and gave them a sense of security. Few technological problems were reported.The use of Interaktor increased patients' sense of security and their reflections on their own well-being and thereby served as a supportive tool for the self-management of symptoms during treatment of prostatecancer. Some further development of the app's content might
) or transperineal ultrasound guided biopsy (TPUSGB) using software fusion of previously acquired mpMRI images and ultrasound images. This method provides real-time ultrasound guidance but does not allow validation of the track of the biopsy needle through the identified mpMRI lesion as the MRI image is not live. MSAC noted that the application proposed these procedures would be used exclusively for the diagnosis of prostatecancer in patients who are likely to be at intermediate/high risk of the disease. MSAC (...) Intervention 2:MR-US fusion $36,213 -$72 8.11 ~0.005 Dominant b 14 ICER = Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio; MR = magnetic resonance; PCa = prostatecancer; US = ultrasound; QALY = quality- adjusted life year a Differences in ICER due to rounding from TreeAge Pro 2015 b Albeit marginal gain in QALYs The model was sensitive to the cost of TPUSGB, the assumption of a disutility for biopsy, the assumption of disease upgrading for false negatives was high and favoured MR-US fusion and MR-in gantry
Bronchial and Thymic Tumours • Neuroendocrine Gastroenteropancreatic Tumours • Adrenal Cancer • Thyroid Cancer Gastrointestinal Cancers Rectal Cancer • Biliary cancer • Gastric cancer • Oesophageal cancer • Cancer of the pancreas • Metastatic colorectal cancer • Anal cancer • Early colon cancer • Familial risk colorectal cancer • Hepatocellular carcinoma Genitourinary Cancers Testicular Germ Cell Cancer • Cancer of the Prostate • Bladder Cancer • Renal Cell Carcinoma • Penile Carcinoma • Testicular (...) Seminoma and Non-Seminoma Gynaecological Cancers Cervical cancer • Endometrial cancer • Gestational trophoblastic disease • Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma • Non-epithelial ovarian cancer Haematological Malignancies Waldenstrom's macroglobulinaemia • Chronic myeloid leukaemia • Newly diagnosed and relapsed mantle cell lymphoma • Multiple myeloma • Newly diagnosed and relapsed follicular lymphoma • Extranodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma